top
San Francisco
San Francisco
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants! Vote Yes on SF Prop F

by Spartacist League (slbayayrea [at] sbcglobal.net)
Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants! Vote Yes on SF Prop F - Yes to School Board Vote for Immigrant Parents
Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants! Vote Yes on SF Prop F - Yes to School Board Vote for Immigrant Parents


A November 2 ballot measure, Proposition F, would amend the city charter to give immigrant parents or guardians with kids enrolled in public schools the right to vote in school board elections, irrespective of their immigration status, for the next four years. Initiated by Board of Supervisors Green politico Matt Gonzalez, the measure has gained widespread support, as well it should. According to a fact sheet from the Immigrant Voting Project, 37 percent of San Francisco residents are foreign-born. The public school population is less than 10 percent white, 21 percent Latino, 14 percent black and 55 percent Asian or other nonwhite. We demand full citizenship rights for all immigrants and support Prop F as a modest step forward.

From Democratic President Clinton’s militarization of the Mexican border to the bipartisan, police-state USA Patriot Act, immigrant rights have dramatically deteriorated, even as immigration, especially of Latinos and Asians, has rapidly increased. Some 8.6 million Californians, nearly a quarter of the state’s population, are foreign-born. Estimates are that nearly a quarter are “undocumented” and thus “illegal” nonpersons under America’s racist anti-immigration laws.

Even before blacks (1868) and women (1920) won legal voting rights, many states and territories allowed immigrants to vote and even hold office. American history shows that black and immigrant rights go hand in hand. Immigrant voting rights reached their height following the Civil War with Reconstruction. With the betrayal of Reconstruction and the rise of Jim Crow segregation, immigrants also came under attack from Congress, the courts and the racist mobs in the streets. The Ku Klux Klan played an integral role in the passage of the 1924 National Origins Act that barred immigration from Asia and severely limited it from southern and eastern Europe. The 1924 Act was not repealed until 1965 under the impact of the civil rights struggle.

Black oppression is the cornerstone of American capitalism. In the face of the bipartisan attacks on immigrant rights, black rights too have fallen back. While funds for education and social services are slashed, the capitalists who run the state and city attempt to divert the oppressed into fighting one another over the crumbs from the pie. In 1996 Prop 209 passed in the state, wiping out what remained of affirmative action for blacks and Latinos in public education and employment and services. Two years later, with the support of a majority of black voters, Prop 227 passed, gutting bilingual education programs that are crucial for non-English-speaking immigrant populations. The groundwork for the various racist propositions that passed in California was laid by the passage of Prop 187 in 1994—with the support of most black and even some Latino voters—which denied emergency services for undocumented immigrants (since ruled unconstitutional). Now, Bush’s sinister “No Child Left Behind” calls to further strip federal funding from schools with low student performance, along with threats to fire the entire school staff, targeting the powerful teachers unions.

As a result of the 1983 Consent Decree requiring that San Francisco Unified desegregate, the city once had one of the most integrated school districts in the country. In 1994, paralleling the national backlash against school integration and affirmative action programs, some Chinese-American parents filed a Jim Crow legal suit to prevent their children being bused to poorer schools on the city’s east side. Under pressure from that suit and the anti-affirmative-action provisions of Prop 209, in 1999 San Francisco Unified altered its desegregation plan, finally agreeing in 2001 to a “diversity index” based on socioeconomic factors. By the 2003-2004 school year, the number of schools with severe segregation (60 percent or higher of one racial group in one or more grade) had more than tripled, from 13 to 42, out of 114 schools (San Francisco Chronicle, 25 September). Based on state tests, black student performance is not only lower than any other group in the district, but lower than their “counterparts statewide and in other major urban centers” (Report No. 21, Consent Decree Monitor, 28 September). Furthermore, “white flight” has meant a drop in the number of white students in the San Francisco public schools by more than a third.

The urgent concern for decent education for their children unites all working people. A major source of the black-immigrant tension is the terrible underfunding of the public schools across the country, especially in the inner cities. Reliance on pressuring politicians and the school board can’t win the resources that public schools need—that will take the mobilization of the power of labor for free, quality education for all, taking up the active defense of immigrant rights and the struggle against racist discrimination.

School Board voting rights for immigrant parents is an elementary democratic demand that undercuts the bosses’ divide-and-conquer strategy and facilitates uniting all the oppressed behind labor power. Important labor support for Prop F includes SEIU Locals 250 and 790, BART transit workers ATU Local 1555, hotel workers UNITE HERE Local 2—a heavily immigrant union now in the middle of a vicious employer lockout—and the San Francisco Labor Council. Yes on Prop F! Defend public education! Free, quality education for all through university! Full citizenship rights for all immigrants!
26 October 2004

Spartacist League
Box 29497, Oakland CA 94604
(510) 839-0851
slbayarea [at] sbcglobal.net
Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
by Mike (stepbystpefarm <a> mtdata.com)
Is it really in the interests of these people for you to conflate the issue of their having "full citizenship rights" with the issue of their having "the rights of local residents".

These are not the same thing at all. Municipalities and other local governments (and quasi governments) get to set their own standards for who is or is not allowed to vote. Your university, your town, etc. does NOT have to require US citizenship of voters and many of ours do not. There is nothing at all crazy about the proposition that all persons resident in a school district get to vote in elections related to the school district. Nor is there a linkage in reverse. Just because you might be an American citizen does NOT give you the right to vote in the xyz school distirct elections (if you aren't a resident of district xyz).

The problem with conflating these matters is if this issue were put to a vote, there are people who would vote no to "letting non citizen residents have all the rights of citizens" who would vote yes to "letting non citizen residents have all the rights of residents". Yes, I understand why the Spartacist position is what it is, but you really should consider whether that means you should not be the leaders of this campaign if it is really to be a question about obtaining full RESIDENT rights for non-citizen residents.
by Qwert
Prop F is transparent, it’s a way of getting and securing new voters than giving immigrants a say in their child’s education. Don’t be fooled by all the mumbo jumbo statistics of Prop F supporters because they never address that immigrants can participate in their children’s education by going to PTA meetings, attending Board of Education meetings, teacher-parents conference, or other ways they can participating in their children education

How about the logistics of this, the board of education can barley run an election with only one ballot, now imagine them having to do 2 different types of ballots.

And finally, none of them can point out to any other country in the world that allows non citizens the right to vote in their election.
by Mike (stepbystepfarm <a> mtdata.com)
But many of our "voting communities" do just that, maintain a roll of people who have voting rights. And US citizenship has nothing to do with that. I just castigated the Spartacists for bring "citizenship rights" into it (for their own political purposes) and now you are doing it in the opposite direction.

No, of course this doesn't require separate registrations. We don't have spearate registrations NOW do we. You register in one place, but that fact alone doesn't necessarily give you ALL the voting rights possible. Just becuase you are registered to vote and eligible to vote in the general election does NOT mean you allowed to pick up a Whig ballot in the primary -- not unless you had that party affiliation included in your registration. Many people have no party affilaition, get no primary rights. All that information is in one place, yes?

So pray tell what is so awfully hard for that same registration office to record people as having "local election voting rights only". It's just one more field to be filled in, yes? Might I humbly point out that this is not actually a new thing and its origins go far back in the West in particular. I don't know about California, but I'm pretty sure some of the territories (Colorado comes to mind) allowed women to vote in local elections LONG before they had the right to vote in elections for Federal office. Now how did they handle registrations for that. Still seems so impossible to you?
by Qwert
Tomorrow read the boards and see how often voter fraud comes up. Hell this site is already filled with articles about voter fraud and the election isn’t until tomorrow. Even during the primaries there were ballot screw up with people not getting the correct ballot for their party affiliation or they were not shown as registered. Now you want to add a new wrinkle to it by adding a “simple field” when we can’t even get the current system 100% correct. Before we start adding new stuff maybe it wiser to fix the current stuff first before we look to adding new stuff.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$190.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network