top
US
US
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

The Right Wing wants to go after women who have had abortions

by BACORR
By Carey Gillam
OVERLAND PARK, Kansas (Reuters) - The Kansas Supreme Court on Friday restricted efforts by Kansas' Attorney General to subpoena the medical records of women who have abortions in the state, requiring that their identities be protected.
In a case closely watched by both sides of the national debate over abortion rights, the court ruled that medical files subpoenaed by Attorney General Phill Kline must first be redacted to remove all identifying information about the women who had the abortions.
"We see today's decision as a significant victory for women's privacy," said Peter Brownlie, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri. "We don't mind being investigated. What we've said throughout this is that he doesn't have the right to investigate our patients."
Kline, a conservative Republican and outspoken opponent of abortion, subpoenaed the entire, unredacted patient files of 90 women and girls who obtained abortions at two Kansas clinics in 2003.
The Attorney General argued that he needed the files to investigate if late-term abortions were being illegally performed and if child abuse was a factor in a pregnancy.
A lower court judge denied a motion to quash the subpoenas but the clinics appealed the order. The court's ruling Friday said a release of unredacted files could violate privacy rights.
"The type of information sought by the state here could hardly be more sensitive, or the potential harm to patient privacy posed by disclosure more substantial," the court said in its ruling.
The case now goes back to the Shawnee County District Court for further action.
Kline's office said it was pleased with the ruling because it meant the investigation could proceed, albeit without identification of the women involved.
The court decision Friday is separate from another case in which abortion rights supporters are challenging Kline's formal written opinion that all sexual intercourse involving anyone younger than 16 is considered rape and could be prosecuted as a crime.
Arguments in that case were being heard Friday in Wichita, Kansas.
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$330.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network