top
East Bay
East Bay
Indybay
Indybay
Indybay
Regions
Indybay Regions North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area North Coast Central Valley North Bay East Bay South Bay San Francisco Peninsula Santa Cruz IMC - Independent Media Center for the Monterey Bay Area California United States International Americas Haiti Iraq Palestine Afghanistan
Topics
Newswire
Features
From the Open-Publishing Calendar
From the Open-Publishing Newswire
Indybay Feature

Oakland City Council Approves Second UrbanCore Luxury Tower for E12th St Parcel

by SaveE12th
On Tuesday, March 15, the Oakland city council approved moving forward with the latest iteration of luxury housing at the E12th Street parcel, public land that was created when the roads and bridges around the south end of Lake Merritt were recently reconfigured. The vote was 6 to 1 in favor of the new luxury tower proposal by developer UrbanCore, with a smaller number of affordable units tacked onto the side. Only Noel Gallo voted against the new proposal. Rebecca Kaplan recused herself after having received an apparently illegal campaign contribution from UrbanCore in 2014. In supporting the second UrbanCore design for luxury housing on the city property, the council rejected The People's Proposal, an alternative plan for affordable housing with no market-rate units that would benefit long-term Oakland residents and the broader community rather than wealthy newcomers. Continuing the long fight for affordable housing on the land, and following the revelation that the city council knew their original proposed sale to UrbanCore was illegal, housing activists showed up to the March 15 council meeting to vociferously oppose the new proposal and succeeded at shutting down the meeting, at least temporarily. The council and Oakland police responded by forcing activists from council's chamber, then holding their discussion and vote in Mayor Libby Schaaf's office, out of the public eye. Critics question whether the city has once again run afoul of public meeting laws and vow to keep the fight alive for "public land for public good." A final vote on the proposed sale to UrbanCore will happen later this year. Below is the E12th Coalition's description of the the offensive monstrosity that the council approved.
servants-quarters-ebaldc-urbancore.png

3 Reasonable Questions About EBALDC’s Segregated Housing Proposal

In case you missed it,

all the public pressure to ‪#‎SaveE12th‬ from a luxury condo tower appears to have pushed our opponents to a new low.

Proposing SEGREGATED HOUSING.

Thanks to our organizing for ‪#‎PublicLandforPublicGood‬ (which now includes our own community-sourced proposal for 100% affordable housing), the luxury tower team has been forced to include affordable units in their proposal for the land, as well.

And this is how they decided to do it.

Urban Core servants quarters copy

Yes, you are seeing that correctly. Still a luxury tower… plus a small box of affordable units kneeling humbly down below.

It’s New York’s infamous “poor door” — now banned, and rightly so — times a thousand.

In light of this development, I have a few questions.

1. What the Fuck?

I CANNOT MAKE THIS UP. THIS IS A REAL PROPOSAL for the piece of public land at E12th. Look in the SF biz journal if you don’t believe me. There, Joshua Simon, Executive Director of East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation (EBALDC), explains:

The affordable and market-rate apartments are in separate buildings for financing reasons, but [EBALDC executive director] Simon said that the design would seek to integrate the affordable and market-rate portions through common spaces.

 

2. Are You Fucking Serious?

What they call “workforce housing,” I would call “servants’ quarters.”

Urban Core servants quarters

Why?

Because it is literally a small box of affordable units tacked on to the luxury tower they are still proposing to build.

And given the trends of gentrification in the Bay Area, this “workforce housing” would likely house people in the service industries — washing dishes, tending bar, nannying kids, fixing Priuses, vacuuming offices, and dry-cleaning clothes, quite possibly for the luxury tower residents who happen to live right next door in $3,200/month 1-bedroom units.

 

3. What On Earth Are You Thinking?

To justify this segregated housing monstrosity (oh, my bad — “mixed-income proposal”), the luxury tower team UrbanCore + EBALDC just unveiled a laughably astroturf web site (complete with colorful paper cutouts of people instead of actual human supporters) championing the “workforce housing project” (a.k.a. servants’ quarters).

ebaldc web site sign

ebaldc web site colorful cutouts

See their whole web site here.

Funnily enough, there is NO MENTION OF THE LUXURY TOWER THAT WOULD WAVE ITS TOWERLY DICK IN THE FACES OF LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS EVERY DAY. In addition to pushing rents sky-high for the whole neighborhood.

Like, really EBALDC? Really?

I would expect this kind of deceit from UrbanCore, who has bribed workers and misled non-English-speaking seniors in efforts to drum up support for their development. And I’m not shocked that BRIDGE, another affordable housing developer, is proposing a tower even though the community clearly and expressly DOES NOT WANT ONE.

But the East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation (EBALDC)? really?

It might be time to rethink your whole entire moral compass. Cuz this is disgusting.

Pull out. Walk away. Work on other projects that you’re good at. Support the People’s Proposal that has been determined by an engaged and transparent community process.

You want good projects on your record, not segregation for fuck’s sake.

Add Your Comments

Comments (Hide Comments)
You would do well to learn from the example of San Francisco - if you build nothing, prices will still rise. In the 1950's, young people (so-called "beatniks") lived in North Beach, and eventually it became too expensive for young people to live there. In the 1960's, and 70's young people (so-called "hippies") lived in the Haight, and eventually it became too expensive for young people to live there. In the 90's, young people (so-called "hipsters") moved into the Mission, and by the mid 2000's, it was too expensive for young people to live there. Now young people are moving to Oakland - building this one tower isn't going to change that one bit. The only thing that can slow down the endless cycle of displacement that has occurred over the last 60-plus years is ADEQUATE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION. More market-rate condos near the lake takes the pressure off of single-family homes in the Fruitvale, West Oakland, and elsewhere.

Your heart is absolutely in the right place, but trust me, you're wrong. More homes at every income level is GOOD for Oakland.

(...and I have no idea why you're upset about separate doors - who cares? The more important thing is the number of units)
by Jason94612
You do realize it is very common for a single piece of property to be set aside for affordable housing development so the affordable housing developer can do its own deal, and often faster. You see the only building going up at MacArthur BART--that's the affordable piece of the project.

Your idea that this is servants' quarters would be laughable if it werent so patently offensive to people who have actually been servants. Grow up
940814_865834030182543_4409878132101689811_n.png
I read with EXTREME disgust your story about how the Oakland City Council people have allowed a “Hirise” (read: Plantation) on some plot of land around Lake Merritt, complete with “SERVANT’S QUARTERS”????!!!! WTF!!!! WHAT THE HELL IS WITH THE PLANTATION MENTALITY IN OAKLAND????!!!!! AND FURTHERMORE, WHAT THE HELL IS THE NAZI BASTARD DICKHEAD RACIST BIGOT trump DOING IN OAKLAND????!!!!

Has Oakland LOST ITS’ MIND, or something???? I may live outside of Oakland, but I GRADUATED from Castlemont, LIVED in Oakland for most of my life, Joined the MILLITARY in Oakland, and came back from overseas TO Oakland…….and THIS is what it has become??? A haven for the Plantation Owners with Slaves and a haven for BIGOT NAZI DICKHEADS like trump??????!!!!! Has the mentality in the Bay area become SO obsessed with wealth and bigotry that they FORGOT who they were? And to those who are SUPPORTING this HEINOUS piece of garbage the the City council is trying to force feed the Oakland area, there is more I could say to you; but I will forgo my own thought to you greedy bastards until later.......but, PLEASE--DO NOT LET THIS PASS WITHOUT A FIGHT!!!! From what I've seen of Oakland, they've CHASED as many minorities OUT of the City as they could; and now, they want to build something where they are "helping" the poorer of the people living there (it is called SERVANTS QUARTERS FOR A REASON, PEOPLE)........Get a clue; STAND UP AND FIGHT!!!!! Oh, and before I go, a little PS for all of you BROWNSHIRTED trump supporters........
by Jeremiah Cornelius
Or merely coincidental.
But it does not take a very vivid imagination to see the clear representation of a Swastika in the EBALDC logo.
by blue and white
and if it did it would be appropriate....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
We are 100% volunteer and depend on your participation to sustain our efforts!

Donate

$230.00 donated
in the past month

Get Involved

If you'd like to help with maintaining or developing the website, contact us.

Publish

Publish your stories and upcoming events on Indybay.

IMC Network